Veterans for Peace Santa Barbara
logo logo

VFP’s Future, Strategy and Framing

This comes as a result of reading Lakoff and Westen on framing:
I’m not advocating embracing the whole “Strategy of Cooperation” as laid out by Admiral Mullen and his team in:
What I would think that VFP should do if it wants to recruit some of the 99.9% of veterans that do not join VFP, is pick the best from the stategy,  perhaps, for instance, this section:
Humanitarian and Disaster Relief Operations & Seapower Strategy

A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower calls for a diplomacy-building approach echoing the mantra that “preventing wars is as important as winning wars”[22] and “focuses on opportunities versus threats; on optimism over fear and on confidence instead of doubt.” [23] It recognizes the challenges imposed by the uncertain conditions in a time of rapid change and makes pro-active assistance and disaster response crucial elements to building relationships across nations. By working with the U.S. State Department, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and non-governmental organizations, maritime forces provide unique capabilities to bear in times of crisis as set forth in the strategy.
While humanitarian missions are generally not traditionally thought of as major sea service missions, military leaders say these tasks are crucial for promoting maritime security. Admiral Gary Roughead said this strategy takes homeland defense, “a step further.” He says that “through globally persistent, maritime forces, U.S. seapower will always exist primarily to fight and help win our nation’s wars but… we can do more.”[6]
When Tropical Cyclone Sidr struck the southern coast of Bangladesh on November 15, 2007, U.S. Navy Sailors and Marines offered almost immediate assistance. Within days, the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), embarked on the amphibious ship Tarawa, was in the devastated country providing crucial care to wounded and displaced citizens.[24] Military corpsmen and doctors bandaged the wounded and worked in concert with the U.S. State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) helping the neediest from a storm that left several hundred thousand Bangladeshis homeless. After the storm, U.S. service members also provided maritime security patrols around the coast of Bangladesh.
The military sea services also responded swiftly to the tsunami that struck Indonesia and Southeast Asia in December 2004. Marines from Naval Environmental and Preventive Medicine Unit Six (NEPMU-6) left their home base of Pearl Harbor a few days later deploying to Indonesia. Once there, dozens of NEPMU members provided humanitarian support including medical help and conducted water quality testing and insect collection for disease examination.[25] Less than a week after the storm hit, Navy helicopters from the aircraft carrier, Abraham Lincoln were flying over the Indian Ocean transporting supplies, bringing in disaster relief teams and supporting humanitarian airlifts to tsunami-stricken coastal regions.[26]
The U.S. Coast Guard provided relief to the tsunami affected regions of Southeast Asia delivering over 40,000 pounds of food January 21, 2005 in the form of emergency high energy biscuits, to Medan, Indonesia and over 21,000 pounds of medical supplies, and temporary shelters to Utaphao, Thailand via two Coast Guard C130 airplanes.[27] Additionally, the U..S. Coast Guard cutter Munro shuttled more than 80 tons of humanitarian relief supplies from Singapore to the Navy amphibious assault ship Bonhomme Richard for distribution to tsunami victims in northern Indonesia.[28]
Admiral Gary Roughead said the U.S. response to the 2004 tsunami in Southeast Asia was, “a demonstration to ourselves and to others of the value of being able to render humanitarian assistance and disaster response from the sea.” He added, “There is no way we could have done it without the sea-based capabilities of a aircraft carrier and expeditionary forces.”[6]
The U.S. sea services also respond to domestic emergencies when needed.. When Hurricane Katrina flooded large portions of New Orleans and the Gulf Coast in 2005, maritime forces responded. Following the late-summer storm, Harry S. Truman, Iwo Jima and other Virginia-based Navy ships headed to the Gulf Coast to help with relief efforts[29]. Thousands of military members were dispatched including Naval Mobile Construction Battalions and six Disaster Relief Teams (DRTs) providing amphibious construction equipment, medical personnel and supplies to the flooded areas.
I hear the doubt in responses,  and I understand, but this idea has been prompted in me by hundreds of hours of dialog with veterans and active duty military outside of our comfort zone,  at Arlington West Santa Barbara,  Arlington West Santa Monica,  VFW, VVA and DAV meetings and other mixed veterans events.   I have vivid recollections of sailors from the USS Abraham Lincoln,  at anchor outside Santa Barbara harbor,  who made a point of visiting AWSB and telling us about the work they did during the Asian Tsunami….who did NOT seem damaged goods,  and joined the Navy to see the world, and were pleased at the good work they did in helping people.  I also remember a young female officer at AWSB with two of her subordinates (men) who corrected a name tag or two and then,  when I asked her what she thought of the wars,  she was ambivalent about Iraq (she had done two tours there) but said of Afghanistan that she had built schools for girls and that it was the best thing she had done in her life.  I reject the damaged goods generalization but will admit probably a 20-30% damaged goods presence among the USMC and Army.
I certainly reject the part of the document
that talks about preserving the “American Way of Life”,  but I think a selective editing and embracing of the strategy is the way to both build membership and influence the future use of our military.  Remember that Mullen was elevated by Obama after this new strategy was created.
In solidarity,  Lane
bottom


Leave a Reply

bottom